Legal Opinion

Torongo v. Miriani

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1968No. Docket 3,616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a jury verdict of no cause of action. Plaintiffs Hector Torongo and Elizabeth Torongo instituted suit for injuries sustained by Hector when the defendants’ ice cream truck backed into him. As General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation had made workmen’s compensation payments to Hector it was al lowed to intervene. For the balance of this opinion “plaintiff” refers only to Hector Torongo.

The accident occurred at the “Mr. Softee” plant on June 30, 1962, where defendant had gone to purchase supplies. When he got into his truck to leave the plant the engine would not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corey v. HartelMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Browne v. Fenestra, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Dupuis v. Saginaw Valley Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Stewart v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. FronteraMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bates v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Bates v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Brown v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API