Legal Opinion
State v. Marshall
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 5, 1997Published
1Opinion of the Court
148 N.J. 89 (1997)
690 A.2d 1
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ROBERT O. MARSHALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 16, 1996.
Decided March 5, 1997.
Judith L. Borman, First Assistant Deputy Public Defender and Joan D. Van Pelt, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Susan L. Reisner, Public Defender, attorney; Ms. Borman, Ms. Van Pelt and Bernadette N. De Castro, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, on the briefs).
Robert E. Bonpietro and Paul H. Heinzel, Deputy Attorneys General, argued the cause for respondent (Deborah T. Poritz,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited173 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.