Legal Opinion

People v. Hussain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mangano, P. J.

The question to be answered on this appeal is whether the defendant was denied his constitutional right to confront witnesses during his trial. In our view, the question must be answered in the affirmative.

I

The defendant and his codefendant Abdul Quyyum (see, People v Quyyum, — AD2d — [decided herewith]) were jointly tried on an indictment charging them, inter alia, with selling heroin to an undercover officer on November 26, 1986.

During the trial, undercover officer number 946 testified as to certain preliminary meetings that he had with the nontestifying…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. KhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Amaker v. LacyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. People v. CedenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. RuizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API