Legal Opinion

Bainbridge Power Co. v. Ivey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1928No. 18565PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The lawful power to construct a dam and impound water does not carry with it the power to create a nuisance by the maintenance of foul and ill-smelling water in the pond and in the breeding- of mosquitoes, to the damage of persons living in the neighborhood of the pond. Holmes v. Atlanta, 113 Ga. 961 (39 S. E. 458).

2. A nuisance of the character indicated above, whether permanent or not, is nevertheless a continuing one, and there may be a recovery for all damage resulting therefrom occurring within the statutory period of limitation, notwithstanding the nuisance may have been created and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. City Council v. LamarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Towaliga Falls Power Co. v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Americus Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thrasher v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Patillo v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Rome Railway & Light Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Bainbridge Power Co. v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Strahley v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API