Bainbridge Power Co. v. Ivey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. The lawful power to construct a dam and impound water does not carry with it the power to create a nuisance by the maintenance of foul and ill-smelling water in the pond and in the breeding- of mosquitoes, to the damage of persons living in the neighborhood of the pond. Holmes v. Atlanta, 113 Ga. 961 (39 S. E. 458).
2. A nuisance of the character indicated above, whether permanent or not, is nevertheless a continuing one, and there may be a recovery for all damage resulting therefrom occurring within the statutory period of limitation, notwithstanding the nuisance may have been created and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- City Council v. LamarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Towaliga Falls Power Co. v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Americus Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Thrasher v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Patillo v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Rome Railway & Light Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Bainbridge Power Co. v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Strahley v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.