State v. Bogdanyi

Defendant was indicted for breaking, entering and larceny (17 M.R.S.A. § 2103), tried before a jury, convicted and has appealed.

We deny the appeal.

The two points reserved on appeal have been, on the facts in this record, preceden-tially decided adversely to the appellant.

I

State v. Curtis, 295 A.2d 252 (Me. 1972), is determinative of appellant’s argument that it was error to refuse the motion for continuance because of the unavailability of a witness.

Appellant also argues that the State’s failure to disclose certain facts pursuant to an order issued under Rule 16(a), M.R.Crim.P., is a further…