Legal Opinion

Dickason Goodman Lbr. Co. v. Foresman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1926No. 16868PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL. C.

This appeal involves the priority of liens between a lumber company that furnished material for building a house on lot 20 in block 9, Forest PSirk addition to city of Tulsa, and a mortgage on the same. The undisputed facts are substantially as follows: Id 1918, the defendants Joseph Foresman and his wife, Georgia H. Foresman, built themselves a dwelling place on the above described lot by excavating a basement about 24 by 36 feet, and surrounded it with a basement wall extending about 3 feet above the ground, dividing it into two rooms, lathed) and plastered, flooring…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kansas Mortgage Co. v. WeyerhaeuserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. American-First Title & Trust Company v. EwingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Industrial Tile Co. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Ketchum, Konkel, Barrett, Nickel & Austin v. Heritage Mountain Development Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Strom Construction Co. v. RaymondMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API