Legal Opinion

Adler v. Schultz

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided February 24, 1999No. 9705154FPublished

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Charles and Marilyn Adler (the “Adlers”) brought an action against defendants Martin and Beverly Schultz, the Estate of Abraham Schultz and BankBoston. As against Martin and Beverly Schultz, the Adlers filed claims arising out of an alleged agreement between Martin and Beverly Schultz and Marilyn Adler to divide Abraham Schultz’s estate in two equal parts (the “50/50 Agreement”). As against the Estate of Abraham Schultz (“Abraham Schultz”), the Adlers asserted claims arising from Abraham Schultz’s alleged promise to make a gift to Marilyn Adler. Finally, as against all…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API