Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Chandler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1914No. 18,831PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Chase district court; William C. Harris, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

On December 3, 1913, the parties by their counsel stipulated in writing that Honorable Robeit C. Heizer, judge of the thirty-fifth judicial district, who had appeared on request of the parties, should try the cause as judge pro tern, and render judgment any day of the term the clerk desired. The journal entry recited that the cause came on for hearing and trial before Judge Heizer, as judge pro tern., by written consent and agreement of the parties, and continued in progress until the 5th of December; that both parties appeared in person and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. DureinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Davis v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. In re NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PrestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fernández Antonetti v. Corte de Distrito de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
  2. State v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. Hancock v. NyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. State ex rel. Parsons v. ReaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Fernández Antonetti v. District Court of PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API