Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1896No. S. F. No. 181PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County. George H. Buck, Judge. The facts are stated in the' opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This is a contest for the office of supervisor in the county of San Mateo. The judgment ap-‘ *308pealed from confirms the election of defendant. The appeal is from the judgment with a bill of exceptions.

In precinct No. 1 the record shows that one hundred and eighteen votes were counted without objection for contestant, gmd eleven votes -were objected to and reserved by counsel for respondent. One hundred and thirty-four votes were counted without objection for respondent, and nineteen votes were objected to by contestant. It subsequently appears-that all ballots were counted, and as counted the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Good v. Common CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  2. State ex rel. Orr v. FawcettWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Patterson v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Bloedel v. CromwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Packwood v. BrownellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API