Legal Opinion

Powell v. Benson

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 2, 2020No. 2:20-cv-11023Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL POWELL, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Case No. 20-cv-11023 v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN JOCELYN BENSON, ET AL., Defendants. ______________ / OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PROPOSED PLAINTIFF- INTERVENOR MARYANN MURAD’S MOTION TO INTERVENE [#70] I. INTRODUCTION On April 24, 2020, Plaintiffs Michael Powell and Fred Wurtzel filed suit against Jocelyn Benson, the Michigan Secretary of State, and Jonathan Brater, the Michigan Director of Elections. See ECF No. 1. In Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, they…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Scotty Grubbs, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Proposed Intervenor/appellant v. Stephen H. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Timothy Jansen, Cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati v. Tilford Youngblood, Prospective Intervenors, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Grutter v. BollingerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API