Legal Opinion
Tyler v. City of Omaha
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided July 29, 1991No. 4:CV91-3045PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DAVID L. PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, filing 4, pursuant to an order of this court. Because plaintiff is proceeding without the assistance of counsel, the amended complaint is before the court for initial review pursuant to Local Rule 52.1 Liberally construing the allegations of the original and amended complaints, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), I conclude that plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which *1268relief may be granted. I shall, therefore, recommend…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Muhammad v. FrakesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
- Shelly v. State Employee JukovicDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
- Tyler (Billy Roy) v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991