Smith v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELDER, J.
Samuel Quentin Smith, Jr. appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of Code § 18.2-256. Smith contends: (1) the trial court erred in allowing the Commonwealth to introduce into evidence a defense witness’s signed stipulation of facts from a prior trial; and (2) the evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he conspired to distribute cocaine. Because we hold that the stipulation of facts signed by the witness constitutes a prior inconsistent writing and that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Traverso v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Josephs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Spruill v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Cartwright v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Armando Gonzales-Loya v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000