Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided February 7, 1995No. 1765-93-1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELDER, J.

Samuel Quentin Smith, Jr. appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of Code § 18.2-256. Smith contends: (1) the trial court erred in allowing the Commonwealth to introduce into evidence a defense witness’s signed stipulation of facts from a prior trial; and (2) the evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he conspired to distribute cocaine. Because we hold that the stipulation of facts signed by the witness constitutes a prior inconsistent writing and that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Traverso v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  3. Josephs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  4. Spruill v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  5. Cartwright v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armando Gonzales-Loya v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API