Legal Opinion

Epstin v. Berman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 5, 1907No. 6680PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before MemmingER, J., Richland, Action by Philip Epstin et al. against Julius Berman et al. Erom order requiring plaintiffs to- amend their complaint, they appeal. cite: 2 Green. Ev., sec. 254; 5 Ency. P. & P., 717, 719; 5 Current E-, 932; 87 E„ 136; 44 E. R. A., 288; 65 S. C., 228; 66 S. C., 17. cite: 8 Rich. Eq., 46; 10 S. C., 480; 16 Cyc., 110; 70 S. C., 108; Hale on Dam., 23, 26, 29, 24, 25, 223; Jogg. on Torts, 80; 1 Cyc.. 660, 666 ; 60 S. C., 72; 6 Ency.

Read the full summary

Before MemmingER, J., Richland, Action by Philip Epstin et al. against Julius Berman et al. Erom order requiring plaintiffs to- amend their complaint, they appeal. cite: 2 Green. Ev., sec. 254; 5 Ency. P. & P., 717, 719; 5 Current E-, 932; 87 E„ 136; 44 E. R. A., 288; 65 S. C., 228; 66 S. C., 17. cite: 8 Rich. Eq., 46; 10 S. C., 480; 16 Cyc., 110; 70 S. C., 108; Hale on Dam., 23, 26, 29, 24, 25, 223; Jogg. on Torts, 80; 1 Cyc.. 660, 666 ; 60 S. C., 72; 6 Ency. P. & P., 274, 276; Code of Proc., sec. 181; 63 S. C., 525; 44 S. C., 46; 71 S. C., 31; 38 S. C., 397 ; 58 S. C., 582; 1 N. & McC.,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This appeal is from an order of Judge Memminger requiring the complaint to be made more definite and certain. The complaint alleges substantially :

1. That The Tree of Eife is a religious corporation organized by the Israelites of the city of Columbia.

3.That the plaintiffs are members and the trustees of said corporation charged with the custody and control of its property.

3. That said corporation owns a certain lot, described, with a synagogue thereon, for use by its members for divine worship.

4. “That the defendants, Julius Berman,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Spartan MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  2. Bolin v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Seegars v. WIS-TVSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Weldon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. Brogdon v. BrittonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Pastime Amusement Co. v. Southeastern Express Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API