Legal Opinion

Southern California District Council of Laborers, Plaintiff-Defendant in Intervention-Appellee v. Berry Construction, Inc., and L & M Plumbing, Inc., in Intervention-Appellant. Southern California District Council of Laborers, Plaintiff-Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee v. Berry Construction, Inc. v. L & M Plumbing, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, and Southern California Pipe Trades District Council No. 16, Plaintiff-Intervenor. Southern California District Council of Laborers, Plaintiff-Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee, Berry Construction, Inc., L & M Plumbing, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Southern California Pipe Trades District Council No. 16, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1993No. 91-55849Published

1Opinion of the Court

984 F.2d 340

142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2388, 124 Lab.Cas. P 10,531

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS,

Plaintiff-Defendant in Intervention-Appellee,

v.

BERRY CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant-Appellant,

and

L & M Plumbing, Inc., Plaintiff in Intervention-Appellant.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS,

Plaintiff-Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee,

v.

BERRY CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant-Appellant,

v.

L & M PLUMBING, INC., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant,

and

Southern California Pipe Trades District Council No. 16,

Plaintiff-Intervenor.

Southern California District Council of Laborers,

Plaintiff-Defendan…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Radio & Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Republic of Nicaragua, a Foreign Sovereign v. Standard Fruit Company, Standard Fruit and Steamship Company, and Castle & Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API