Legal Opinion

Marat Corp. v. Abrams

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Motion to cancel a notice of pendency of action pursuant to subdivision (a) of section 6514 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules is denied, without prejudice to a renewal if the plaintiff does not apply to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for a stay within 30 days from the service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon.

The papers reveal that a final judgment dismissing the complaint, with $25 costs, was entered on November 21, 1963 in an action for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. An undertaking to pay the sum of $25 was filed on or about…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Da Silva v. MussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Shihab v. 215-217 West 108th Street AssociatesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986
  3. Freedom Enterprises, Inc. v. Hager Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API