Legal Opinion

Shihab v. 215-217 West 108th Street Associates

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided September 22, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lewis R. Friedman, J.

These are two cases which were commenced under RPAPL article 7-A. They are being decided together because they present for decision two important issues which have not been addressed in the reported cases: (1) the rights of a party who commences a proceeding under RPAPL article 7-A to file a notice of pendency, and (2) the rights of the owner to a cancellation of a notice of pendency which has been filed in an article 7-A proceeding.

BACKGROUND

A proceeding under RPAPL article 7-A can be commenced either by the Commissioner of the Department of Housing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Braunston v. Anchorage Woods, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Lawrence v. MartinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986
  4. Keating v. HammersteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Maresca v. 167 Bleecker, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RivieccioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
  2. Amsterdam v. GoldstickCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987
  3. Martin v. 352 Cathedral Equities, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API