Legal Opinion

New York Central Railroad v. Sharp

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crosby, J.:

This case is submitted upon a stipulated set of facts, the essentials of which are as follows: That a certain shipper, called the Rio Grande Growers’ Exchange, shipped a carload of tomatoes from Mercedes, Tex., to itself at Buffalo, and that the initial carrier issued what is known as a straight bill of lading (as distinguished from an order bill of lading); and that upon the bill of lading appeared a direction to “ Notify W. A. Sharp ” (the defendant) ; that the plaintiff was the final and delivering carrier; that it notified defendant, and that defendant gave plaintiff a written…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. New York Central Railroad v. Warren Ross Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Western & Atlantic R. v. UnderwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tank Lining Corp. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Chicago Great Western Railroad v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. New York Central Railroad v. Maloney, New York County Courts1930
  4. New York Central Railroad v. Niagara Fruit Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. A. F. D., Inc. v. Barry Oil Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API