New York Central Railroad v. Sharp
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Crosby, J.:
This case is submitted upon a stipulated set of facts, the essentials of which are as follows: That a certain shipper, called the Rio Grande Growers’ Exchange, shipped a carload of tomatoes from Mercedes, Tex., to itself at Buffalo, and that the initial carrier issued what is known as a straight bill of lading (as distinguished from an order bill of lading); and that upon the bill of lading appeared a direction to “ Notify W. A. Sharp ” (the defendant) ; that the plaintiff was the final and delivering carrier; that it notified defendant, and that defendant gave plaintiff a written…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- New York Central Railroad v. Warren Ross Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Western & Atlantic R. v. UnderwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tank Lining Corp. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Chicago Great Western Railroad v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- New York Central Railroad v. Maloney, New York County Courts1930
- New York Central Railroad v. Niagara Fruit Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- A. F. D., Inc. v. Barry Oil Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.