Legal Opinion

Wattenbarger v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 1985No. 135,549; CA A32736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

This is an appeal of a proceeding under ORS 656.388(2) to determine attorney fees in a workers’ compensation case. Claimant seeks an increase in the fee awarded and argues that the “reasonable attorney’s fee” provided for by statute should reflect the risk factor involved in a contingent fee arrangement, and hence, that a multiplier should have been utilized to establish a reasonable fee in this case. We reject claimant’s argument and affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

In the underlying workers’ compensation aggravation claim, the referee awarded claimant permanent total disability. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Forney v. Western States PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. McRae v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ParesiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wattenbarger v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API