Legal Opinion
Blasch v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold J. Hughes, J.
Defendants Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Corporation (Chrysler) move for an order granting leave to serve a supplemental answer raising the affirmative defenses that plaintiffs entered into a settlement agreement with codefendant Gary Paone and that any judgment must be reduced by the amount of that settlement or Paone’s apportioned share of liability. Chrysler further seeks an order directing an examination before trial of an agent of Paone’s liability insurance carrier, directing an examination before trial of an agent of Paone’s liability…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Gordon v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- American Employers Insurance v. Goble Aircraft Specialties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Oxford Commercial Corp. v. LandauNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- CORDIAL GREENS COUNTRY CLUB, INC. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Blasch v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Federal Insurance v. Cablevision Systems Development Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Rosenberg v. New York University HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1985