Legal Opinion

Trueblood v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1914No. 3086PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, McClain County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by Mary J. Trueblood against E. B.' Johnson to restrain defendant from removing improvements from an allotment. From a judgment in favor of defendant, dissolving a temporary restraining order, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

The facts in this case are that Mary J. Trueblood had selected an allotment, upon which improvements, consisting of a house, sheds, an orchard, and fencings had been made by Johnson prior to the selection of the allotment by Trueblood. There is no controversy between the parties over the right to the allotment, but after it had been awarded to plaintiff Johnson sought to remove certain improvements, and Trueblood obtained a temporary restraining order against his' so doing. The cause came on for final hearing in February, 1911, at which time judgment was rendered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winans v. BeidlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  2. McGlassen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API