Legal Opinion

Winans v. Beidler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County; before James B. Keaton, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Dale, C. J.:

This case is brought here from Oklahoma county to reverse the district court in a proceeding in injunction. It appears from the record that Winans, plaintiff in error, filed an application asking for an injunction to restrain George A. Beidler, one of the defendants in error, from removing improvements placed by Beidler upon a tract of land claimed by him as a homestead. That Winans was a contestant against George A. Beidler before the United States land office for a tract of land, and afterwards made final proof therefor and received a patent to the land.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Ness v. PacardSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Clark v. ShultzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1835

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kay County Gas Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Patterson v. ChaneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Swain v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Gatto v. BoydNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Trueblood v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API