Legal Opinion

CHAMBER OF ARGENTINE-PARAGUAYAN PRODUCERS OF QUEBRACHO EXTRACT v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 30, 2005No. CIV.A.05-0811 ESHPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUVELLE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Chamber of Argéntine-Para-guayan Producers of Quebracho Extract and its two Argentinean members, Unitan and Indunor (“the Chamber”), bring this action challenging defendants’ decision to resume sales of its remaining stockpiled quebracho, alleging that such sales violate the Strategic Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (“Stock Piling Act”), 50 U.S.C. §§ 98 et seq. Plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), claiming that defendants have failed to provide a rational…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Chamber of Argentine-Paraguayan Producers of Quebracho Extract v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006