Legal Opinion

Murawski v. Hinenberg

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 15, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The writ in this action directed the attachment of the body of the defendant and the complaint alleged that he had conveyed away his property with intent to prevent it from being taken by the plaintiff to satisfy the admitted debt sued upon, while having estate not exempt from execution sufficient to discharge the debt and that he had concealed and withheld such estate so that it could not be taken by legal process. The action was therefore a pro ceeding based upon § 5994 of the General Statutes. That being so and there appearing to have been no abandonment of an intent to seek relief by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farley-Harvey Co. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Allen v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flaherty v. SchettinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Flaherty v. SchettinoPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1949
  3. Flaherty v. SchettinoConnecticut Superior Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API