Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Alexander

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1976No. Civ. 48537PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant-appellants, William D. Alexander, Nina B. Alexander and W&N Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation, from an order denying their motion to dissolve a writ of attachment previously obtained by plaintiff-respondent, Rudolph Johnson, Jr. We affirm.

On October 3, 1972, plaintiff Rudolph Johnson, Jr., and defendant William D. Alexander entered into a written contract whereby plaintiff agreed to provide certain services for defendant in connection with the making of the feature length motion picture entitled “The Klansman.” Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henck v. Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. World Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kurtz Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Samuels v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MizrahieUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  2. City of Larkspur v. Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Diamant v. Johnson Controls Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Ding, Ph.D. v. Structure Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
  5. Sic Metals, Inc. v. Hyundai Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API