Legal Opinion
Getsinger v. Midlands Orthopaedic Profit Sharing Plan
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided June 16, 1997No. 2687PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Judge:
W.J. Getsinger, Jr. and Hugh C. Horry (Appellants) appeal the circuit court’s order granting a directed verdict in favor of Respondent Midlands Orthopaedic Profit Sharing Plan (Midlands). 1 The judge found as a matter of law that Midlands and its predecessors in title had adversely possessed a parcel of land claimed by Appellants. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On June 24, 1993, Appellants filed this action seeking to have a legal determination of the ownership and true boundaries of a parcel of land. Respondent Midlands filed an answer on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gamble v. International Paper Realty Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Rice v. Multimedia, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Weston v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Garrett v. LockeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
- Bultman v. BarberSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sims v. GilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Ecclesiastes Production Ministries v. Outparcel Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Hurd v. Williamsburg CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Jones v. LeaganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- The Huffines Co., LLC v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.