Legal Opinion
United States v. Royal Globe Indemnity Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 14, 1977No. Civ. A. No. 76-984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1033MEMORANDUM
CAHN, District Judge.
Before the court are cross motions for summary judgment. This controversy involves a claim by the United States of America (“Government”) on a surety bond issued by Royal Globe Indemnity Company (“Royal”). The facts are not in dispute, and therefore, the matter is ripe for summary judgment.
On November 28, 1969, Jack Lopez Wholesale Shirt Laundry, Inc., filed a petition for a Chapter XI Arrangement pursuant to the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. On December 1, 1969, William E. Chambers, Esquire, was appointed Receiver for the debtor and was ordered to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State of Missouri v. EarhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Van Cor, Inc. v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Martin v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quinn v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (In Re Sturm)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- United States v. Associated Developers of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980