Manson Unemployment Compensation Case

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The only question raised on this appeal is whether appellant was guilty of willful misconduct within the meaning of that phrase as used in §402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(e), when, after numerous warnings, he was discharged for being habitually tardy. The Bureau of Employment Security, the referee and the Board of Beview all concluded that the appellant was ineligible to receive benefits. We have carefully reviewed the entire record and agree with that conclusion.

The law has been so clearly and recently set forth in a number of our decisions that…