Legal Opinion

Truelove v. Blue Cross

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1978No. 13491PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVIN, Judge.

From judgment for the insured for benefits under a hospitalization policy ($954) and for attorney’s fees ($500), the insurer appeals. We affirm.

The insurer contends that the medical condition for which benefits were sought pre-existed the policy and that Art. IX of the policy should control since it excludes from coverage such pre-existing conditions during the first year of the policy.1

Emphasizing that no application was attached to the policy as required by R.S. 22:618 (see also R.S. 22:219, 616), the lower court held that no evidence of a pre-exist-ing condition could be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Spain v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. Smith v. North American Co. for Life, Acc. & H. Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  4. State, Dept. of Highways v. TrainaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Henderson v. Minn. Mut. Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Borer v. Louisiana Health Serv. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Estate of Borer v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Truelove v. Blue Cross of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API