Legal Opinion
Howley v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 29, 2016No. Civil Action No. 14-CV-11874PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*534 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt , 23)
■ MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Gerard “Tim” Howley was employed by Defendant Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) for about twenty years. In 2013, following three disciplinary actions within a 12-month period, Plaintiffs employment was terminated. Plaintiff subsequently sued FedEx pursuant to Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (“ELCRA”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2101 et seq., alleging that he was the victim of unlawful age discrimination.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shrivastava v. RBS Citizens Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017