Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Nomination Petition of Granat

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1991No. 786 C.D. 1991Published

1DissentPellegrini, Judge

I dissent. The majority holds that the School District lacks standing to challenge the Nominating Petitions of candidates for office who fail to file Statements of Financial Interest required to be filed by the Ethics Act.1 I believe the majority’s decision is in conflict with Commonwealth State Ethics Commission v. Baldwin, 66 Pa.Commowealth Ct. 40, 444 A.2d 767, affirmed, 498 Pa. 255, 445 A.2d 1208 (1982).

Prior to the 1989 amendments, all Statement of Financial Interest forms were required to be filed by the candidates with the State Ethics Commission.2 Addressing whether *383the Ethics…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, State Ethics Commission v. BaldwinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. In re Nomination Petition of BaranyaiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API