Legal Opinion

State v. Arana

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1992No. CR-92-0193-PRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

We are asked to decide whether the felony assessment penalty under A.R.S. § 13-812 is applicable to defendants convicted of class 6 felonies and placed on probation with delayed designation under A.R.S. § 13-702(H). We hold that it is.

BACKGROUND

Arana was charged with theft, a class 3 felony. She pled guilty to a “Class Six Open-Ended Felony.” Plea Agreement, Appendix to Opposition [to] Petition for Review. Invoking the alternative provisions of A.R.S. § 13-702(H), the trial court entered judgment of guilt for theft, an “undesignated” offense. The trial court placed the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. RisherArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. AranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. DiazArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Matter of BerenArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Canava v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API