Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Walker v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1974No. 49012Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEvans, Judge

I concur with Divisions 1, 3 and 5 of the majority opinion. I dissent from Division 2 and from Division 4. My reasons for dissent are set forth hereafter.

Enumeration of Error No. 1: State’s counsel requested the court to allow J. P. Reece, the prosecutor, to be excepted from the rule of sequestration "due to the fact that I plan to call him about the fourth witness and I need him for an orderly presentation of the case and to assist me during the prosecution.” Defendant’s counsel objected and requested that the state be required to place the prosecutor on the witness stand before any other…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Shaw v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Bullard v. HolmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API