Moore v. American Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The plaintiff in error insists, among other things, that the nonsuit here was unauthorized on the theory, as urged by the defendant in error, that the insurance policy did not cover the concrete mixer which was placed upon the insured chassis after the issuance of the policy. The policy was what is usually termed an automobile policy. An automobile usually consists, not merely of a chassis and engine, but also of some sort of body in which one may ride. In the present case the insurer saw fit to define the “automobile” which it was insuring and provided…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boston Ins. Co. v. WadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
- Atlantic Steel Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Myers v. American Indemnity CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Titus v. West American Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Drexler Motor Co. v. BruceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957