Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1983No. 12327PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

An information filed April 30, 1980, charged defendant with stealing 86 cattle owned by Joe and James Jackson. On April 24, 1981, the day of trial but before any evidence was heard, and over defendant’s objections, the court permitted the state to amend the information so as to accuse defendant of stealing 87 cattle. The jury found defendant guilty and, per the verdict, he was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of seven years. §§ 570.030 and 558.-011. 1 Defendant appealed.

Defendant’s first point relied on is that the trial court erred in permitting the amendment to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. State v. BurrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. State v. WeekleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  5. State v. NetzerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ByrdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. State v. MerrittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. GarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API