Cunningham & Kaming, P. C. v. Nadjari
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 17, 1976, denying motion to quash subpoenas duces tecum, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, as hereinafter set forth, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. One of the subpoenas calls for production by a bank of the records of the plaintiff professional corporation of which the individuals are principals. Appellants have no standing to object to this subpoena, as we have said in Matter of Democratic Committee v Nadjari, 52 AD2d 70, citing United States v Miller, 425 US 435), and it is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Democratic County Committee v. NadjariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Shapiro v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- American Tobacco Company v. American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In re R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1987
- In re SelesnickNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.