Legal Opinion

George Carroll & Bro. Co. v. Young

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 7, 1903No. 24PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

The principal asset of the bankrupt, the Hygeian. Milk Company, was its manufacturing plant, being a two-storied brick building equipped with boiler and engine, vats, pumps, tanks, and other machinery for making condensed milk, which the bankrupt had erected upon a piece of land in the city of Erie, county of Erie, Pa., held by the bankrupt under a lease for years. The appellants, the George Carroll & Brother Company and James McCarty, respectively, had furnished materials (the former, woodwork and lumber to the amount of $1,246.93; the latter, brick to the amount of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mountain City Market House & Hall Ass'n v. Kearns & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  2. Thomas v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  2. Drybrough v. WareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  3. In Re Wesley CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1937
  4. Marine Nat. Bank v. McCreery & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  5. First Savings & Banking Co. v. KilmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API