Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [2]), a class B felony. We reject defendant’s contention that items of *952physical evidence seized by police should have been suppressed as the product of an illegal stop not supported by a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity (see, People v Willsey, 198 AD2d 911, lv denied 83 NY2d 812). The record does not support defendant’s contention that the guilty plea was involuntarily obtained. Despite defendant’s professed inability to recall the events underlying the robbery…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. FloresNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. HobotNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. BramanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. Di PaolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. PeraltaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. Hall-MizrahiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. HighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. PetixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API