Legal Opinion

Everest Indemnity Insurance v. Rea

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 15, 2015No. 1 CA-SA 14-0094PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 The issue presented in this special action is whether Petitioner Everest Indemnity Insurance Company has impliedly waived the attorney-client privilege by asserting subjective good faith as a defense in this bad faith case. For the reasons that follow, we accept special action jurisdiction and grant relief.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Everest challenges the trial court’s order requiring production of documents it contends are privileged communications between it and its counsel. Real Parties in Interest Rudolfo Brothers Plastering and Western Agricultural Insurance Company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. XYZ Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Twin City Fire Insurance v. BurkeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ingram v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  2. Robert W. Baird & Co. v. WhittenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Centex Homes v. NGM Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. Evanston Insurance Company v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  5. Garibaldi v. Everest National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API