Legal Opinion

People v. James

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 13, 1965No. Gen. 50,192PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

delivered the opinion of the court.-

In a jury trial, defendant, Edward James, was tried jointly with Lydell Walls on a charge of forcible rape. Both were found guilty,' and each was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of 15 to 25 years. Defendant, Edward James, on appeal, contends: (1) that the evidence did not prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, since the testimony of the complaining witness was uncorroborated; and (2) that the trial court committed prejudicial error in allowing the jury to hear evidence of a separate and distinct offense.

The prosecutrix, Mrs. Tanetta Harrington,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The People v. GallowayIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. The People v. FaulisiIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. The People v. ArdeleanIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  5. People v. O'CONNORIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. JamesIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. CalhounAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Edward James v. John Twomey, Warden, Illinois State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. State v. WhiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API