Legal Opinion

Cheney Bigelow Wire Works v. Sorrell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 21, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

This is an action to recover the price of a “counter rail.” The plaintiff put in evidence a postal card signed by the defendants, of which the substance is as follows: “ Please send us pice of counter screen like draft.” Upon this card was a draft of a counter screen with the measurements thereof. The court rightly ruled that this order was unmeaning and unintelligible, and that it could not be construed as an order for a piece of counter railing. It presents a case of incurable uncertainty; and the court properly refused to submit it to the jury to determine whether the letters “ pice ”…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Brighton Packing Co. v. Butchers' Slaughtering & Melting Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Elks v. . Insurance CoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Wellington v. RuggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Tanning Co. v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API