Legal Opinion
Bey v. Saginaw County
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 17, 1986No. 85-CV-10141-BCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHURCHILL, District Judge.
This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which the plaintiff alleges that he was arrested and incarcerated for more than 80 days without probable cause and without being afforded a timely preliminary examination, both in violation of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. Defendant Saginaw County has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(b).1
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) provides that a party shall be granted summary judgment if it is shown that “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Little v. City of SaginawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023