Legal Opinion

Mokkala v. Mead

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided November 3, 2005No. 14-04-00708-CVPublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice.

In these consolidated interlocutory appeals, we are called upon to construe section 74.351(a) and (b) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, which pertains to the filing of expert reports for health care liability claims.1 Appellants, healthcare providers, challenge the trial court’s orders denying their motions to dismiss with prejudice their health care liability claims under section 74.351, which provides in relevant part:(a) In a health care liability claim, a claimant shall, not later than the 120th day after the date the claim was filed,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. MillardTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Crofts v. Court of Civil Appeals for the Eighth Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Buck v. Blum, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Hyundai Motor Co. v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Loaisiga v. CerdaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston v. Gutierrez, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  3. Thoyakulathu v. Brennan, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  4. Center for Neurological Disorders, P.A. v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Estate of Regis v. Harris County Hospital District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API