Legal Opinion

People v. Richardson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 21, 2008No. 1-05-0955PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garcia

The defendant, Anthony Richardson, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his successive postconviction petition. Richardson argues his appointed postconviction counsel provided unreasonable assistance by failing to amend his petition to include allegations he was brutalized by Detective Robert Dwyer and other detectives working under the command of Jon Burge at Area 2 Violent Crimes, and he was denied the effective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. Richardson also contends appointed counsel failed to satisfy the requirements of Illinois Supreme Court Rule 651(c) (134 Ill. 2d R. 651(c)).

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. GaultneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. PendletonIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. ProfitAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. People v. LandaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  4. People v. MendozaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API