Legal Opinion
Gollehon Farming v. United States
District Court, D. Montana
Decided June 12, 1998No. CV-96-033-GF-PGHPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HATFIELD, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiffs, consisting of 346 farmers and 2 grain elevator companies located in Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota, instituted the present action seeking monetary and declaratory relief for injuries allegedly incurred between May 2, 1993, and January 24, 1994, when the Federal Grain Inspection Service (“FGIS”), 1 adopted the Near Infrared Transmittance (“NIRT”) technology as the official method for estimating the protein content in wheat analyzed under its national wheat testing program. Plaintiffs’ claims for monetary damages are…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jones v. Mississippi Dept. of Transp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Suddith v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISS.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
- Gollehon Farming v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Chapman v. City of QuitmanCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
- Ard v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.