Legal Opinion
Harold EE. v. Roger EE.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 7, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarpinello, J.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered August 18, 2003, which, inter alia, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, for custody of his niece.
The child at issue in this proceeding is now two years old. Following a hearing, Family Court granted sole legal and physical custody of the child to petitioner, her paternal uncle. Only respondent Roger EE., the child’s father, takes issue with this determination. We now affirm.
As a prefatory matter, we are compelled to point out that the father does not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bennett v. JeffreysNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re Tiffany AA.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- McDevitt v. StimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re Mathew Z.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ruth L. v. Clemese Theresa J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Daniel C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Angel DD.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Ruth L. v. Clemese Theresa J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013