Mark B. Harrison v. BNSF Railway Company
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILL MEIER, Justice.
I. Introduction
We consider in this appeal whether a ballast regulation promulgated under the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA) precludes Appellant Mark B. Harrison’s ballast-related claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). We hold that it does and will therefore affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee BNSF Railway Company.
II. Background
BNSF hired Harrison in 1993. He worked as a brakeman for a year before being promoted to a locomotive engineer.
One day in April 2008, Harrison directed a train onto a siding located in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. FieldingTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. JoachimTexas Supreme Court · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sean Van Buren v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- Sean Van Buren v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2025