Legal Opinion

Mark B. Harrison v. BNSF Railway Company

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided January 30, 2014No. 02-12-00476-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL MEIER, Justice.

I. Introduction

We consider in this appeal whether a ballast regulation promulgated under the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA) precludes Appellant Mark B. Harrison’s ballast-related claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). We hold that it does and will therefore affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee BNSF Railway Company.

II. Background

BNSF hired Harrison in 1993. He worked as a brakeman for a year before being promoted to a locomotive engineer.

One day in April 2008, Harrison directed a train onto a siding located in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. FieldingTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Travelers Insurance Co. v. JoachimTexas Supreme Court · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sean Van Buren v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. Sean Van Buren v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API