Legal Opinion

Serdaroglu v. Serdaroglu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated October 22, 1992, as granted the motion by Silvio and Jean Pollero for leave to intervene.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the motion to intervene is denied.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the Polleros’ motion to intervene. This Court has repeatedly held that such a motion should not be granted when, as here, it is not accompanied by pleadings as required by CPLR 1014…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carriage Hill, Inc. v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. Colonial Sand & Stone Co. v. FlackeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Mohawk Maintenance Co. v. DrakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Rozewicz v. CiminelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Serdaroglu v. SerdarogluAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API