Legal Opinion
Rozewicz v. Ciminelli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 24, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Memorandum: In the absence of a timely motion made in accordance with CPLR 2214 and accompanied by a proposed pleading as required by CPLR 1014, it was error for Special Term even to entertain the request of New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company to intervene in this action (Matter of Colonial Sand & Stone Co. v Flacke, 75 AD2d 894, 895; Mohawk Maintenance Co. v Drake, 29 AD2d 689; Matter of Carriage Hill v Lane, 20 AD2d 914; cf. Ryder v Travelers Ins. Co., 37 AD2d 797; Sterling Natl. Bank & Trust Co. v Ambassador Factors Corp.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carriage Hill, Inc. v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Colonial Sand & Stone Co. v. FlackeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Ryder v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Mohawk Maintenance Co. v. DrakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Sterling National Bank & Trust Co. v. Ambassador Factors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zehnder v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Grella v. Mid-America Realty Investors Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Serdaroglu v. SerdarogluAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. ConleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018