Legal Opinion

Leslie v. Leslie

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1892Published

On motion to strike out parts of an answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

The complainant applies, on notice under’ paragraph 224 of the rules, to strike out several parts of the defendant’s answer. By force of the rule just mentioned, such an application, when the pleading put on trial is an answer, takes the place of exceptions, and the question whether the application shall be granted or not must, I suppose, be decided by the application of the same-*156«rules which would be applied in deciding whether exceptions to an answer are well taken or not. Though the notice under which this application is made arraigns those parts of the answer which it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woods v. MorrellNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. Hawley v. WolvertonNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  3. Van Rensselaer v. BriceNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  4. Desplaces v. GorisNew York Court of Chancery · 1832

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API