Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stines v. Locke

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1975No. 13654PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Caplan, Justice:

The single issue for resolution in this original proceeding in prohibition is whether the “three term rule,” embodied in W. Va. Code, 1931, 62-3-21, as amended, prohibits the state from trying the petitioner in the circumstances hereinafter set forth. That statute provides, in pertinent part:

Every person charged by presentment or indictment with a felony or misdemeanor, and remanded to a court of competent jurisdiction for trial, shall be forever discharged from prosecution for the offense, if there be three regular terms of such court, after the ... indictment is found…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. DeBerryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ex parte BraceyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State v. UnderwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. Farley v. KramerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Ex parte Hollandsworth v. GodbyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Shorter v. HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Leonard v. HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. FoddrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. LacyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. DrachmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API